Gleeden's Survey: Market Creation Disguised as Research?

A French extramarital dating app has released survey data claiming more than a third of urban Indians are in open relationships—a figure that strains credulity in a country where divorce rates hover around 1% and arranged marriages remain the norm. The findings, released alongside Gleeden's announcement of hitting 3 million Indian users, represent market creation dressed as market research. Yet beneath the commercial framing, there may be genuine signals about relationship dissatisfaction in a society undergoing rapid social transition.

Marketing Exercise or Meaningful Data?

The survey, conducted by IPSOS across 1,500 respondents, suggests 61% of urban Indians believe humans aren't naturally monogamous, whilst 51% report emotional disconnection from their partners. These figures arrive with convenient timing for Gleeden, which has a clear commercial interest in normalising infidelity. Every data point suggesting Indians are 'naturally' inclined toward non-monogamy makes the product feel less transgressive and more inevitable.

The 35% open relationship claim deserves particular scrutiny. India remains deeply influenced by conservative marriage norms, and legal frameworks around adultery only shifted in 2018 when the Supreme Court decriminalised it. The idea that more than a third of urban Indians are practising consensual non-monogamy doesn't square with any other available data on relationship structures in the country.

Create a free account

Unlock unlimited access and get the weekly briefing delivered to your inbox.

Register free

No spam. No password. We'll send a one-time link to confirm your email.

This is market creation masquerading as market research—operators should treat these findings with the same scepticism they'd apply to any vendor-commissioned study that happens to validate the vendor's business model.

Sampling Bias and the Values-Behaviour Gap

The methodology reveals significant limitations. IPSOS restricted respondents to tier-1 and tier-2 cities among app-using demographics, skewing heavily toward digitally-connected, English-speaking, urban Indians. This cohort represents a fraction of the country's 1.4 billion population and is demonstrably more liberal on social issues than rural or semi-urban populations.

There's a substantial gap between stated belief and actual behaviour. Believing humans aren't "naturally monogamous" is a low-stakes intellectual position. Acting on that belief—navigating an open relationship, using an extramarital platform, confronting social stigma—requires crossing social, familial, and often professional boundaries that remain formidable in India.

Indian dating operators have long observed this disconnect. Match Group subsidiary Tinder saw it during India expansion: high engagement, low conversion to in-person meetings, and persistent concerns around privacy and social discovery. The survey findings may reflect aspirational attitudes or intellectual curiosity rather than actionable intent, particularly given the legal and social risks still associated with extramarital relationships.

Commercial Context and Competitive Positioning

Gleeden's 3 million user milestone positions India as a growth market for extramarital platforms. For context, category leader Ashley Madison claimed approximately 80 million members worldwide as of 2023, though user counts in this category are notoriously inflated or include dormant accounts. The company doesn't break out India-specific figures.

The timing matters. India's broader dating market has seen consolidation and plateauing growth. Bumble scaled back India marketing spend in 2023 as unit economics proved challenging. Match Group has focused investment on Tinder and local acquisition Hyperconnect rather than building India-specific products. Niche platforms have struggled with monetisation outside metro areas.

Extramarital platforms face unique operational challenges. Verifying relationship status is nearly impossible, the risk of misuse or harassment is elevated, and trust and safety obligations are amplified when the product explicitly facilitates socially contentious behaviour. They're not competing directly with mainstream dating apps—the use case and user intent are fundamentally different.

Whether that dissatisfaction translates into acceptance of non-monogamy, open relationships, or extramarital activity is a separate question—and one a vendor-commissioned survey can't reliably answer.

What the Data Might Actually Show

Strip away the commercial framing, and there may be legitimate signals. Urban India is experiencing rapid social change. Arranged marriages are increasingly preceded by courtship periods, women's workforce participation is rising, and exposure to Western relationship models is near-universal among younger, urban cohorts. Legal shifts—decriminalising adultery, recognising live-in relationships in some contexts—reflect evolving judicial attitudes even if societal norms lag.

The emotional disconnection figure aligns with patterns documented elsewhere: rising relationship dissatisfaction in societies undergoing rapid economic and social transition, particularly where marriage remains more institution than partnership. Whether that dissatisfaction translates into extramarital activity is the question this survey doesn't reliably answer.

For dating operators, the India opportunity has always been about scale tempered by challenging unit economics and cultural complexity. Niche plays like Gleeden's depend on carving out a segment willing to pay premium prices for discretion and specificity. The survey's findings, however suspect, do suggest there's a segment—small, urban, affluent—exploring relationship models outside traditional monogamy. Whether that's 35% or 3.5% of the addressable market is the question the data doesn't actually settle.

The regulatory environment bears watching. India's draft Digital India Act and ongoing debates around platform liability could impose stricter content moderation and user verification requirements. Extramarital platforms would face disproportionate scrutiny, particularly given potential for misuse in a market where relationship status verification is largely honour-system. Gleeden's growth may depend less on shifting cultural attitudes and more on staying ahead of regulatory attention—even as India's secret affair market shows signs of expansion alongside evolving attitudes toward marriage and infidelity.

D