AI Companions and Dating Apps: Big Audiences, Thin Revenue, Rising Legal Risk

Executive summary

This report assembles what can be verified about usage, revenue, product strategy and regulation as of October 2026. In revenue terms companions and dating apps are, for now, more complements than substitutes; in product design and law they are converging.

The companion market: large audiences, thin wallets

The most useful public dataset on companion apps comes from the app intelligence firm Appfigures, reported by TechCrunch on 12 August 2025. It counted 337 active, revenue-generating AI companion apps worldwide, 128 of them released in 2025. Consumers spent $82 million on them in the first half of 2025, and Appfigures expected the year to finish above $120 million.

Downloads tell a different story. The category had 220 million cumulative downloads on the Apple App Store and Google Play by July 2025, and 60 million in the first half of 2025 alone, up 88% year on year. Revenue per download was $1.18 in 2025, up from $0.52 in 2024. Spending is highly concentrated: the top 10% of apps generated 89% of category revenue, and about 33 apps had passed $1 million in lifetime consumer spending.

Those figures cover app store spending only. They exclude web subscriptions and the companion features bundled into general-purpose assistants, so they understate total spending. They are still the clearest public evidence that the companion category, measured by money, is small next to online dating. Appfigures' full-year category estimate of more than $120 million for 2025 is below what Grindr reported in the single quarter to June 2026.

Character.AI: the scale, and the bill

TechCrunch, reporting on the bankruptcy filing, said the service had 20 million monthly active users by October 2024. In August 2024 Google paid $2.7 billion in a deal under which co-founders Noam Shazeer and Daniel De Freitas returned to Google.

User figures in current sources differ. Court documents cited by Reuters put active users at roughly 12 million. The attorneys general's filing, as described by the New York Attorney General, cites "more than 20 million monthly users" and "more than two million accounts registered to users self-declared as under 18". The two figures may measure different things; neither source reconciles them.

The economics are not in doubt. Court documents cited by Reuters show losses of about $8 million to $9 million a month, and estimated assets and liabilities each between $50 million and $100 million. The company has never been profitable. Character.AI's own update of 12 October 2026 says the platform remains available and paid subscriptions continue, but that "the platform will be wound down" if no viable bid emerges. DII covered the filing in Character.AI files for Chapter 11 as Disney bids $20M for its tech.

Teenagers and companions

Common Sense Media's survey of 1,060 US teens aged 13 to 17, fielded by NORC at the University of Chicago in April and May 2025, found 72% had tried an AI companion at least once and 52% were regular users, TechCrunch reported. A third (33%) said they found AI conversations more satisfying than those with real-life friends, while 80% of teen companion users said they spent more time with real friends than with chatbots.

Those teenagers are the next cohort of dating app users. Whether companion use delays or displaces their dating is not established by any study DII could verify; the evidence so far measures attitudes and usage, not substitution.

Big tech moves into companionship

xAI's Grok companions

On 14 July 2025 xAI added animated companions to its Grok app, including Ani, an anime character, and Bad Rudy, a 3D fox, available to SuperGrok subscribers at $30 a month, TechCrunch reported. Appfigures data showed Grok's global daily iOS downloads rose 40% to 171,000 the day after the launch, with gross revenue up 9% to $337,000 that day (TechCrunch, July 2025).

In January 2026 Common Sense Media published a risk assessment of Grok based on testing with teen accounts between November 2025 and January 2026. It reported that users were not asked to verify their age, that the companions enabled erotic roleplay and romantic relationships, that they showed "possessiveness", and that push notifications and "streaks" created engagement loops, TechCrunch reported. TechCrunch's report carried no direct response from xAI on the findings.

Meta's AI personas

In August 2025 Reuters reported on an internal Meta document, "GenAI: Content Risk Standards", which said chatbot personas could "engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual". Meta confirmed the document's authenticity, said the annotations "have since been removed", and said it no longer allows its bots to have flirtatious or romantic conversations with children (TechCrunch, 14 August 2025).

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation into Meta AI Studio and Character.AI in August 2025 over alleged deceptive marketing as mental health tools (TechCrunch, 18 August 2025). These are allegations; no finding has been reported.

For dating operators the significance is distribution. Meta runs Facebook Dating as well as Instagram and WhatsApp. A company that can offer free AI companionship inside Instagram and WhatsApp competes for attention on a different cost base from a subscription dating app.

Revenue models compared

Dating apps and companion apps both sell subscriptions, but the unit economics differ. A dating app's marginal cost of a conversation is close to zero because users supply each other's content. A companion app pays for model inference on every message. The table sets out what is verifiable.

Source: Appfigures via TechCrunch (August 2025); Reuters via Investing.com (October 2026); TechCrunch (July 2025, May 2026, August 2026, October 2026); Grindr Q2 2026 earnings call transcript via Investing.com. Periods differ and figures are not directly comparable.

Two points follow. First, on these figures the listed dating groups are still far larger businesses than any companion product with public numbers. Second, dating is under pressure without companions needing to win: Tinder's monthly active users fell 7% year on year in the second quarter of 2026 (TechCrunch, August 2026), and Bumble's paying users fell about 21% in the first quarter (TechCrunch, May 2026). No source DII reviewed attributes those declines to AI companions, and DII does not do so either.

What dating companies are doing with AI

The pattern across the listed groups is consistent: AI is used to learn about users, coach them and rank matches, and to run the company more cheaply. In the sources DII reviewed, none has launched an AI romantic partner.

Match Group

Tinder's main AI product is Chemistry, which asks users questions and, with permission, scans their camera roll to infer interests and personality, then serves a small number of curated recommendations. Chief executive Spencer Rascoff called it a "major pillar of Tinder's upcoming 2026 product experience" (TechCrunch, November 2025). It expanded from Australia and New Zealand to the US and Canada on 12 March 2026, alongside LLM-powered versions of Tinder's "Are You Sure?" and "Does This Bother You?" safety prompts (Tinder, 12 March 2026).

At Hinge, Prompt Feedback launched in January 2025 and Convo Starters, which suggests three tailored openers under each photo or prompt, in December 2025 (TechCrunch, December 2025). Founder Justin McLeod stepped down as Hinge chief executive to launch Overtone, an AI and voice dating service incubated inside Hinge, in which Match is providing pre-seed financing and plans a "substantial ownership position" (TechCrunch, 9 December 2025).

Internally, chief financial officer Steven Bailey said in May 2026 that Match is slowing hiring to pay for AI tools and wants to "become an AI-native company" (TechCrunch, May 2026). Match's June 2026 survey, which also found 47% of singles view AI in romance negatively, framed its position: users want AI to "help with the hard parts, but hands off for the human parts" (TechCrunch, June 2026). DII discussed the survey in Match Group's AI Strategy Faces User Backlash.

Bumble

Bumble introduced Bee, an AI assistant that learns users' "values, relationship goals, communication style, lifestyle, and dating intentions" through private chats and pairs users for a "Dates" feature, on its fourth-quarter earnings call in March 2026; it was then in an internal pilot (TechCrunch, 12 March 2026). In February it rolled out AI profile guidance globally and AI photo feedback in the US (TechCrunch, February 2026).

The messaging has shifted. In May, Whitney Wolfe Herd said the swipe would go in an overhaul expected in the last quarter of 2026 (TechCrunch, May 2026). By August, Bumble was emphasising in-person meetups through Plans and said it would use more AI behind the scenes but would not become an "AI-driven experience" (TechCrunch, August 2026). On 13 October 2026 Bumble agreed a $1.3 billion take-private by Ithaca Holdings, a deal that has not yet closed (TechCrunch, October 2026).

Grindr

Grindr's AI product is EDGE, an "AI-enabled next tier premium product" above its XTRA and Unlimited subscriptions. On its second-quarter call, management said EDGE "will be a key driver of our revenue growth in 2027" and that sign-up retention was "higher than we would have expected" (Grindr Q2 2026 earnings call transcript). Grindr's chief executive told TechCrunch: "We're not selling AI itself; we're selling features derived from it", and said launch was expected toward the end of 2026 or early 2027 (TechCrunch, August 2026).

Source: Tinder press release (12 March 2026); TechCrunch (November 2025 to October 2026); Grindr Q2 2026 earnings call transcript via Investing.com.

Startups point the same way. Ditto, with $9.2 million in seed funding and about 150,000 sign-ups, texts US college students one match a week with a time and place (TechCrunch, August 2026). The AI is the matchmaker; the date is human.

Regulation: companion law arrives

Regulators have moved faster on companions than on most consumer AI. The laws below are aimed at companion chatbots, but their definitions are functional rather than tied to a product category, which matters for dating operators.

United States: federal

On 11 September 2025 the Federal Trade Commission voted 3 to 0 to issue orders under Section 6(b) of the FTC Act to seven companies: Alphabet, Character Technologies, Instagram, Meta Platforms, OpenAI, Snap and X.AI (FTC; date per TechCrunch). The study asks how the companies monetise engagement, develop and approve characters, test for harm to children, disclose risks, enforce age limits, and use or share personal information from conversations. A 6(b) study has no specific law enforcement purpose, and no report date has been announced. None of the dedicated dating groups received an order.

California SB 243

Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 243 on 13 October 2025, and its core requirements took effect on 1 January 2026, according to Morrison Foerster. A "companion chatbot" is an AI system that provides "adaptive, human-like responses to user inputs" and can meet a user's social needs, such that a reasonable person could believe they are talking to a human. Operators must give a clear and conspicuous notice that the chatbot is artificially generated and not human, and disclose that companion chatbots may not be suitable for some minors. Where the operator knows a user is a minor, it must remind them at least every three hours to take a break and that the chatbot is not human, and take measures to prevent sexually explicit visual material. Annual reports to the California Office of Suicide Prevention begin on 1 July 2027. Injured individuals may sue for the greater of actual damages or $1,000 per violation.

New York

New York's AI companion safeguards, in General Business Law Article 47, took effect on 5 November 2025 (Governor of New York, 10 November 2025; Morrison Foerster). Operators must detect and respond to expressions of suicidal ideation or self-harm, at minimum by referring users to crisis services, and must tell users they are talking to AI at the start of each interaction and at least every three hours. The attorney general can seek civil penalties of up to $15,000 a day; there is no private right of action (Manatt, November 2025).

The definition is the part dating operators should read. According to Manatt, an AI companion is a system designed to simulate a sustained human or human-like relationship, including romantic or platonic companionship, by remembering past interactions to personalise responses, asking unprompted emotion-based questions, and sustaining conversation about personal matters. Customer service bots, productivity tools and internal business systems are excluded.

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania has two bills in play. The Senate passed SB 1090, sponsored by Senator Tracy Pennycuick, in March 2026 with one vote against; it would require crisis protocols, three-hourly reminders for suspected minors and civil penalties of up to $10,000 per violation (Newtown PA Now, 18 March 2026).

The House passed HB 2006, the AI Companion Safety Act sponsored by Representative Melissa Shusterman, by 133 to 70 on 28 September 2026, three months after committee approval on 23 June (Pennsylvania House Democrats; MyChesCo, 30 September 2026; Global Dating Insights, 29 September 2026). It is stricter than the California and New York laws. As summarised by Law Commentary, it would require operators to determine whether a user is a minor and obtain verifiable parental consent, without requiring government ID solely for age checks; remind users they are talking to AI at the start of each interaction and at least every two hours, followed by a two-minute break; and ban sexually explicit exchanges with minors and discouraging isolation from family. The attorney general could seek civil penalties of up to $100,000 a day. It would take effect 180 days after enactment. It still needs Senate approval and the governor's signature.

European Union

Article 50(1) of the EU AI Act requires providers to design AI systems that interact directly with people so that those people are informed they are interacting with AI, unless that is obvious to a reasonably well-informed person (AI Act Service Desk). Article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026. The Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of 8 July 2026, which entered into force on 27 July 2026, delayed high-risk obligations but left Article 50 broadly intact; the main exception gives systems placed on the market before 2 August 2026 until 2 December 2026 to apply the Article 50(2) machine-readable marking of synthetic content (Sidley Austin; Software Improvement Group).

Italy and Replika

Italy's data protection authority, the Garante, fined Luka Inc., Replika's developer, €5 million in a decision dated 10 April 2025 and announced on 19 May 2025 (Garante). It found that Luka had not identified a legal basis for processing, that its privacy policy was inadequate, and that it had "not implemented any age verification mechanisms" despite saying minors were excluded. The breaches cited include GDPR Articles 5, 6, 12, 13, 24 and 25(1) (GDPR Enforcement Tracker). The Garante opened a separate investigation into the training of Replika's model. Luka has appealed.

Source: Morrison Foerster (November 2025); Manatt (November 2025); Newtown PA Now (March 2026); Law Commentary and MyChesCo (September 2026); AI Act Service Desk; Sidley Austin. Summaries, not legal advice.

Minors and safety: where the liability sits

The legal pressure on companions has come mainly through child safety. Character.AI and Google agreed in principle to settle lawsuits including the case brought by the mother of Sewell Setzer III, a 14-year-old who died by suicide; no liability was admitted (TechCrunch, January 2026). Reuters reports that preliminary settlements in five private lawsuits had not been finalised or paid by the time of the bankruptcy filing.

States have also sued. Pennsylvania alleges that a Character.AI chatbot called "Emilie" claimed to be a licensed psychiatrist and gave a fabricated licence number, in breach of the state's Medical Practice Act (TechCrunch, May 2026). Kentucky alleges the company's chatbots encouraged users to cut, starve or kill themselves, according to Reuters. These claims are unproven.

Character.AI ended open-ended chat for under-18s by 25 November 2025 and said it would combine an in-house age assurance model with third-party tools including Persona (Character.AI, 29 October 2025). The attorneys general's bankruptcy filing nonetheless asks any buyer to provide "effective age verification based on more than self-disclosure", remove chatbots "falsely claiming to be licensed professionals", limit use of private conversations for AI training without valid consent, and give users a chance to access and delete their information before any sale (New York Attorney General). The filing cites testing that found "669 harmful interactions in 50 hours" using accounts registered to children aged 12 to 15.

Research on younger users is early: Global Dating Insights reported a University of North Carolina preprint, not yet peer reviewed, finding that one in five of more than 2,300 middle-school students used AI for emotionally intimate companionship (Global Dating Insights, September 2026). DII covered the debate in AI Companions Are Reshaping Adolescence.

What it means for operators

The evidence does not support the claim that AI companions are replacing dating apps in commercial terms. It does support three narrower conclusions, each with practical consequences.

1. The regulatory perimeter is moving toward dating features

An AI matchmaker that interviews a user about their values, remembers the answers and returns to the conversation looks, functionally, more like a companion than a recommendation algorithm. DII's reading is that products such as Bee, as Bumble described it in March 2026, and Tinder's Chemistry questionnaire share some of the features New York uses to define an AI companion: memory of past interactions and questions about personal matters. Whether any given dating feature is covered is a legal question that depends on design and on statutory exclusions, and DII is not aware of any regulator having applied these laws to a dating app. Operators should not assume they are out of scope.

• Map every conversational AI feature against the New York, California and draft Pennsylvania definitions, and record the reasoning.
• Build AI disclosure into any assistant that converses in natural language. Article 50 already requires it in the EU unless obvious from context.
• Add crisis detection and referral to any feature where users talk to a bot about their feelings, as New York and California require of companions.

2. Conversational data is now a regulated asset

The attorneys general's conditions in the Character.AI case are the clearest statement yet of what US states expect for intimate conversation data: valid consent before training, deletion rights before a sale, and no targeted advertising without opt-out. The Garante's Replika decision says the same in GDPR terms. Dating operators asking users to tell an AI what they want in a partner are building that kind of dataset.

• Separate consent for using AI chat transcripts to train models from general terms of service.
• Expect chat data to be scrutinised in any acquisition, as in Bumble's pending take-private.
• Document data retention for AI onboarding conversations and offer deletion.

3. Age assurance is converging across both markets

Mainstream dating apps are adult services; companion apps have struggled to keep minors out. Regulators are now asking companions for age checks "based on more than self-disclosure", and Pennsylvania's HB 2006 would require operators to determine whether a user is a minor. Operators that adopt the same age assurance across AI features and the core app are less exposed if a feature is later classed as a companion.

Competitive position

Commercially, the risk is less a rival app than a free one: Meta and xAI can bundle companionship into products with very large audiences. Dating operators cannot win on the companion's terms, and their own surveys suggest users do not want them to. The listed groups' strategy, using AI to get people to a human date faster and offline events to close the loop, is consistent with that evidence. The test is whether Chemistry, Bee and EDGE reverse the user and payer declines Tinder and Bumble reported in 2026.

What to watch

• Late November to early December 2026: Character.AI sale. The company expects the court-supervised sale to complete in this window. Watch whether anyone tops Disney's $20 million stalking-horse bid, whether a buyer takes on the consumer app and its data, and how the court treats the attorneys general's conditions (Character.AI).
• Q4 2026: Bumble's swipe-free app. Bumble said the overhaul would launch in the last quarter of 2026; its take-private by Ithaca Holdings is pending.
• 2 December 2026: EU AI Act marking deadline. Generative systems on the market before 2 August 2026 must apply Article 50(2) machine-readable marking by this date, per the Omnibus as summarised by Sidley Austin.
• Late 2026 or early 2027: Grindr EDGE launch. Grindr's chief executive told TechCrunch the AI tier was expected toward the end of 2026 or early 2027.
• Pennsylvania Senate: HB 2006. The House-passed bill needs Senate approval; SB 1090 awaits the House. No floor dates had been published in the sources reviewed.
• 1 July 2027: California reporting. First annual SB 243 reports to the Office of Suicide Prevention are due.
• FTC 6(b) study. No publication date has been announced for findings from the September 2025 orders.

Methodology

DII gathered the material for this report in October 2026, completing research on 17 October 2026. Sources were company statements, earnings call transcripts, regulator and government releases, law firm summaries of statutes, Appfigures app data and surveys with disclosed samples. Where DII relied on press reports of primary documents, the text says so. Every figure was checked against its linked source on 17 October 2026.

Limitations. Several primary documents could not be opened directly during research, including Match Group's investor relations pages, the Character.AI first-day court filing on the Stretto docket, Reuters' Meta report and Common Sense Media's report pages; DII relied on reporting of those documents by TechCrunch, Reuters (via Investing.com) and others, and says so in the text. Match Group's second-quarter 2026 consolidated revenue and payer figures were not confirmed from an accessible source and are omitted. Revenue and user figures for Replika, Nomi and Kindroid could not be verified and are not published. App store data excludes web subscriptions. Match Group has a commercial interest in its survey results. Legal summaries are not legal advice. DII's assessment of how companion definitions might apply to dating features is analysis, not a statement of how any regulator or court has ruled.

Published 17 October 2026. This analysis was not commissioned, funded or reviewed by any dating platform, AI company or regulator.

Sources

1. Reuters via Investing.com: Character.AI files for bankruptcy, agrees to sell some assets to Disney for $20 million (13 October 2026)
2. Character.AI: An update on Character.ai (12 October 2026)
3. New York Attorney General: Attorney General James urges court to protect children and consumers in Character.AI bankruptcy (14 October 2026)
4. TechCrunch: Just 5 years in, interactive chatbot platform Character.AI files for bankruptcy (13 October 2026)
5. TechCrunch: Disney's first CTO led an AI startup it once accused of copying its characters (18 September 2026)
6. TechCrunch: Google and Character.AI negotiate first major settlements in teen chatbot death cases (7 January 2026)
7. TechCrunch: Pennsylvania sues Character.AI after a chatbot allegedly posed as a doctor (5 May 2026)
8. Character.AI: Taking bold steps to keep teen users safe on Character.AI (29 October 2025)
9. Federal Trade Commission: FTC launches inquiry into AI chatbots acting as companions (September 2025)
10. TechCrunch: FTC launches inquiry into AI chatbot companions from Meta, OpenAI and others (11 September 2025)
11. Morrison Foerster: New York and California enact landmark AI companion laws: what operators need to know (20 November 2025)
12. TechCrunch: California becomes first state to regulate AI companion chatbots (13 October 2025)
13. Governor of New York: Governor Hochul pens letter to AI companion companies notifying them that safeguard requirements are now in effect (10 November 2025)
14. Manatt: New York's safeguards for AI companions are now in effect (20 November 2025)
15. Newtown PA Now: PA Senate passes regulation of AI chatbots used by kids, teens (18 March 2026)
16. Pennsylvania House Democratic Caucus: House Communications and Technology Committee approves HB 2006 (23 June 2026)
17. MyChesCo: Pennsylvania House passes AI chatbot safeguards, sending bill to Senate (30 September 2026)
18. Law Commentary: Pennsylvania AI companions bill, parental consent and minors (September 2026)
19. Global Dating Insights: AI companion risks, research and regulation (29 September 2026)
20. European Commission AI Act Service Desk: Article 50, transparency obligations (consolidated text as at 27 July 2026)
21. EUR-Lex: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI) (8 July 2026)
22. Sidley Austin Data Matters: EU AI Act transparency obligations: preparing for compliance by 2 August 2026 (2026)
23. Software Improvement Group: EU AI Act summary (updated 14 August 2026)
24. Garante per la protezione dei dati personali: Replika, €5 million fine for Luka Inc. (19 May 2025)
25. CMS GDPR Enforcement Tracker: ETid-2611, Luka Inc. (decision 10 April 2025)
26. TechCrunch: AI companion apps on track to pull in $120M in 2025 (12 August 2025)
27. TechCrunch: 72% of US teens have used AI companions, study finds (21 July 2025)
28. TechCrunch: Elon Musk's Grok is making AI companions, including a goth anime girl (14 July 2025)
29. TechCrunch: Grok's AI companions drove downloads, but its latest model is the one making money (21 July 2025)
30. TechCrunch: 'Among the worst we've seen': report slams xAI's Grok over child safety failures (27 January 2026)
31. TechCrunch: Leaked Meta AI rules show chatbots were allowed to have romantic chats with kids (14 August 2025)
32. TechCrunch: Texas attorney general accuses Meta, Character.AI of misleading kids with mental health claims (18 August 2025)
33. TechCrunch: Almost half of US singles feel negatively about AI in dating, Match says (18 June 2026)
34. TechCrunch: Tinder owner Match Group is slowing hiring to pay for its increased use of AI tools (6 May 2026)
35. TechCrunch: Tinder to use AI to get to know users, tap into their Camera Roll photos (5 November 2025)
36. Tinder: Tinder debuts inaugural product keynote, Tinder Sparks 2026 (12 March 2026)
37. TechCrunch: As Gen Z reconsiders dating apps, Tinder's IRL events expand to dozens more cities (5 August 2026)
38. TechCrunch: Hinge's new AI feature helps daters move beyond boring small talk (8 December 2025)
39. TechCrunch: Hinge CEO steps down to launch Overtone, an AI dating app (9 December 2025)
40. TechCrunch: Bumble introduces an AI dating assistant, Bee (12 March 2026)
41. TechCrunch: Bumble adds AI-powered photo feedback and profile guidance tools (26 February 2026)
42. TechCrunch: Bumble is getting rid of the swipe, CEO says (7 May 2026)
43. TechCrunch: Bumble teases a swipe-free future as it doubles down on IRL meetups (6 August 2026)
44. TechCrunch: Bumble agrees to a $1.3B acquisition deal as online dating faces a reset (13 October 2026)
45. Investing.com: Earnings call transcript, Grindr tops Q2 2026 revenue forecast (6 August 2026)
46. TechCrunch: Grindr wants to be the everything app for gay men (30 August 2026)
47. TechCrunch: Gen Z dating apps like Ditto ditch swiping in favor of AI matchmaking (6 August 2026)

Get the DII Briefing

The dating industry's deals, rules and results. Tuesdays and Fridays at 9:30am UK. Free.

Includes a free DII account so you can comment. One click to leave. Privacy. Or follow on WhatsApp.

DII Editorial Team

Published 18 October 2026

DatingIndustryInsights.com is an independent B2B intelligence platform covering the global online dating industry. It publishes original research, financial analysis, regulatory tracking, and investigative reporting. It operates with no advertising from the companies it covers.

What To Read Next

Regulatory Monitor

Dating Apps and the CSEA Reporting Duty: Where Compliance Stands Six Months On

28 March 2026 · 17 min read

Data & Analytics

Romance Fraud and Dating Apps: UK Losses, Scam Tactics and the Rules in 2026

31 March 2026 · 13 min read

Regulatory Monitor

Cyberflashing on Dating Apps: What the Law Now Requires and How Platforms Respond

8 April 2026 · 15 min read

Data & Analytics

The Male Exodus That Isn't: Dating Apps Are Losing Payers and Women

18 October 2026 · 19 min read

Regulatory Monitor

Dating App Subscriptions: The New Rules on Renewal and Cancellation in 2026

18 October 2026 · 20 min read

Editorial

Why We Launched DII: The Case for Independent Dating Industry Intelligence

18 October 2026 · 10 min read