# Match Group's Safety Gamble: Garbo's Collapse Exposes a $3B Oversight > By DII Regulatory Monitor | Published: 2025-08-28T00:00:00+00:00 | Section: Regulatory Monitor | Source: https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/tinders-background-check-partner-shuts-down | Publisher: Dating Industry Insights (High Intent Media Inc) Garbo's shutdown leaves Match without integrated checks amid rising regulatory demands. Will Match build safety in-house or face scrutiny? ## Key points - Nonprofit background check service Garbo shut down operations after ending its partnership with Match Group across platforms including Tinder. - Match Group generated 3.19 billion dollars in revenue last year without disclosing what percentage of its operating budget goes towards safety features. - Garbo founder Kathryn Kosmides attributed the closure to lack of platform investment from Match Group and targeted harassment from individuals flagged in searches. - A 2023 investigation found more than 700 sexual offences in the United Kingdom over five years involved dating applications, including Match Group services. ## Article - Garbo, the nonprofit background check service integrated across Match Group 's dating platforms including Tinder, shut down operations last month after the partnership ended - Match Group reported $3.19B in revenue last year but has not disclosed what it paid Garbo or what percentage of its operating budget goes toward safety initiatives beyond content moderation - Garbo processed more than 100,000 searches across Match platforms, a tiny fraction of Tinder 's estimated 75M global users - A 2023 Sunday Times investigation found more than 700 sexual offences in the UK over five years involved dating apps, with cases spanning Match Group platforms The collapse of Garbo, a nonprofit background check service that partnered with Match Group across Tinder and other platforms, has left dating app users with effectively no integrated safety screening options. Founder [Kathryn Kosmides](https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/people/kathryn-kosmides) attributed the closure to insufficient platform support and targeted harassment from individuals flagged in the database. The shutdown arrives precisely as regulatory pressure around platform safety intensifies across the UK and EU. The failure matters less for what Garbo was—a modestly-sized nonprofit serving a fraction of Match's user base—and more for what it reveals about how seriously the £12.8B dating conglomerate treats safety infrastructure. According to Kosmides, the service struggled to secure sustainable funding despite screening tens of thousands of potential matches. Match Group has not disclosed what it paid Garbo or what percentage of its operating budget goes toward safety initiatives beyond content moderation. Dating app safety and background check concept ### The Economics of Outsourced Safety Match Group integrated Garbo across Tinder, Match, and other properties in 2021, allowing users to run background checks for gender-based violence, harassment, and other offences using just a phone number or name. The service charged users $2.50 per search. Kosmides told media outlets that [the partnership ended due to lack of platform investment](https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/17/23836215/match-group-tinder-background-checks-garbo-partnership-end) and what she described as coordinated harassment from individuals whose records appeared in search results—though Match has not publicly commented on either claim. The business model was precarious from inception. Garbo operated as a nonprofit, dependent on philanthropic funding and partnership fees at a time when most safety-adjacent startups were either acquired or shut down. Match Group could have purchased the technology outright or built equivalent functionality in-house. It chose neither. > Match maintained an arm's-length partnership that allowed the company to tout safety features without assuming the full cost or operational burden of maintaining them. That approach looks increasingly untenable. The UK Online Safety Act, which came into force last year, places direct liability on platforms for user safety and requires dating services to conduct risk assessments and implement protective measures. The European Union's Digital Services Act imposes similar obligations. Both frameworks assume platforms will build safety into their core operations, not bolt it on through third-party partnerships that can evaporate when funding dries up. Online platform regulation and safety compliance ### What Match Group Loses and Doesn't Replace Garbo's closure leaves Match properties without integrated background screening. Users can still access standalone services like Checkr or BeenVerified, but these require leaving the app, manually inputting information, and paying higher fees—friction that dramatically reduces adoption. The service processed more than 100,000 searches across Match platforms, indicating genuine demand despite representing a tiny fraction of Tinder's estimated 75M global users. Match Group has not announced a replacement service or disclosed whether it plans to develop in-house background check functionality. The company's most recent earnings call made no mention of safety infrastructure investments beyond standard trust and safety operations. [Bumble](https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/bumble-lawsuit-over-preventable-data-breach), Match's primary competitor, never integrated Garbo but does offer photo verification and has invested more visibly in identity confirmation features. The gap matters because dating app-related violence remains a persistent concern. A 2023 investigation by the Sunday Times found that more than 700 sexual offences in the UK over a five-year period involved dating apps, with police forces reporting cases involving Match Group platforms. Ofcom, the UK communications regulator enforcing the OSA, has explicitly identified dating services as high-risk and expects them to implement proportionate systems and processes to protect users from illegal content and activity. > Background checks are not mandated, but regulators are asking pointed questions about what platforms are doing proactively. ### The Funding Model That Nobody Wanted to Fix Kosmides has been direct about Garbo's structural challenges. In statements to media, she cited both the difficulty of sustaining a nonprofit in a space dominated by for-profit platforms and the personal toll of harassment from individuals whose records appeared in the database. Some users of the service faced retaliation when flagged individuals discovered they'd been searched. The nonprofit structure meant Garbo lacked the legal and security resources that a well-funded corporate entity could deploy. Match Group's silence on the partnership's end is conspicuous. The company has made safety a rhetorical priority, regularly citing its trust and safety team size and moderation investments in earnings materials. But the Garbo relationship was always presented as an optional add-on rather than core functionality, and Match never disclosed the financial terms or how many users actually adopted the tool. Technology platform business and corporate responsibility Other platforms have taken different approaches. Chorus, a UK-based dating app, requires all users to pass a criminal record check before joining. Keeper, a smaller US platform, uses third-party identity verification. Both have faced criticism for creating barriers to entry and potentially excluding users with criminal records who pose no safety risk. But both also assume direct responsibility for safety rather than outsourcing it to underfunded partners. ### What Comes Next for Platform Liability The regulatory environment is shifting faster than product development. Ofcom has begun issuing safety notices to platforms under the OSA, and the regulator has indicated dating services will face heightened scrutiny. The DSA, meanwhile, requires very large online platforms to publish risk assessments and demonstrate how they're mitigating harm. Match Group qualifies under that threshold. Dating operators now face a choice: build safety infrastructure that meets regulatory expectations and user demand, or continue retrofitting third-party solutions that may not survive. Garbo's collapse suggests the latter approach is no longer viable. The question is whether Match Group and its competitors will treat this as a wake-up call or as a problem that disappeared along with the nonprofit that was trying to solve it. - Outsourcing safety to underfunded third parties is no longer viable under UK and EU regulations that place direct liability on platforms—operators must build core safety infrastructure or face regulatory consequences - Watch whether Match Group announces in-house background check development or alternative safety tools in upcoming earnings calls, as silence suggests the company views this as a reputational issue rather than regulatory risk - Expect Ofcom and EU regulators to scrutinize dating platforms more aggressively following high-profile safety tool failures, potentially forcing industry-wide investment in verification and screening capabilities ## Key takeaways - Regulatory frameworks like the UK Online Safety Act and EU Digital Services Act prevent dating platforms from outsourcing safety obligations to underfunded third parties. - Compliance teams at Match Group and rival dating platforms must develop proprietary verification tools to satisfy heightened scrutiny from regulators such as Ofcom. - Investors in Match Group should anticipate higher operational costs as the company moves from low-cost external partnerships to dedicated internal safety infrastructure. ## FAQ ### Why did Garbo close its background check service on Tinder? Garbo founder Kathryn Kosmides stated that Garbo closed due to insufficient platform investment from Match Group and targeted harassment from individuals flagged in the database. ### How many background checks did Garbo complete for Match Group? Garbo processed over 100,000 searches across Match Group platforms before shutting down, representing a small fraction of Tinder's 75 million global users. ### How does the UK Online Safety Act affect Match Group? The UK Online Safety Act places direct legal liability on Match Group to assess user safety risks and implement proactive measures against illegal activity. --- Canonical: https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/tinders-background-check-partner-shuts-down Citation: "Dating Industry Insights" (https://www.datingindustryinsights.com)