--- title: "Duo's ₩345M Fine: Matchmaking's Opaque Promises Under Fire" description: "South Korea's FTC fines Duo ₩345M for misleading claims. The case highlights the global issue of unverifiable promises in premium matchmaking services." lang: en-GB json-ld: | [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "NewsArticle", "headline": "Duo's ₩345M Fine: A Warning Shot for Matchmaking's Opaque Promises", "description": "South Korea's FTC fines Duo ₩345M for misleading claims. The case highlights the global issue of unverifiable promises in premium matchmaking services.", "abstract": "South Korea's FTC fines Duo ₩345M for misleading claims. The case highlights the global issue of unverifiable promises in premium matchmaking services.", "image": [ "https://images.pexels.com/photos/19535711/pexels-photo-19535711.jpeg" ], "datePublished": "2026-09-02T07:05:55+00:00", "dateModified": "2026-09-02T07:05:55+00:00", "inLanguage": "en-GB", "isAccessibleForFree": true, "wordCount": 1132, "articleSection": "Regulatory Monitor", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "DII Regulatory Monitor", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/author/regulatory-monitor", "jobTitle": "Policy & Regulation Desk", "description": "The DII Regulatory Monitor tracks legislation, enforcement action, safety rules and compliance across dating industry markets.", "knowsAbout": [ "Online dating industry", "Dating app business models", "Match Group", "Dating industry regulation" ], "sameAs": [], "worksFor": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Dating Industry Insights", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/" } }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Dating Industry Insights", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/images/am-rebrand-logo.jpg" }, "parentOrganization": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "High Intent Media Inc", "url": "https://www.highintentmediagroup.com" } }, "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/matchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads" }, "isPartOf": { "@type": "WebSite", "name": "Dating Industry Insights", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/" }, "speakable": { "@type": "SpeakableSpecification", "cssSelector": [ "article h1", "article .article-body > p:first-of-type" ] }, "alternativeHeadline": "South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined matchmaking firm Duo ₩345 million for making false advertising claims regarding its membership credentials and matchmaker headcount.", "mainEntity": { "@type": "ItemList", "name": "Key points", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined matchmaking firm Duo ₩345 million for making false advertising claims regarding its membership credentials and matchmaker headcount." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Duo advertised having up to 230 professional matchmakers, but an investigation revealed only 188 employees actively arranged matches as of October 2023." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "The regulator found Duo falsely claimed to be South Korea's only externally audited matchmaking company, despite competing firm Baroyeon having public audit records on DART." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Duo previously received a ₩1.2 billion penalty after a cyberattack exposed sensitive personal profile data belonging to more than 427,000 paid members." } ] }, "backstory": "Premium dating operators using subjective descriptors such as elite or high quality must establish verifiable benchmarking standards to avoid regulatory sanctions for misleading marketing. As global consumer protection authorities focus on pre-purchase information asymmetry, matchmaking companies must substantiate member database claims using objective, third-party data.", "citation": [ { "@type": "WebPage", "name": "Duo claimed the largest number of professionals and prestigious university graduates in the industry", "url": "https://news.sbs.co.kr/english/article.do?news_id=N1008723432", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "news.sbs.co.kr" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "name": "The FTC explicitly stated that membership numbers, member qualifications, and matchmaker headcount influence consumer ch", "url": "https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/korea/matchmaker-service-duo-penalized-for-claiming-the-most-doctors-and-elite-graduates/12844965", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "koreajoongangdaily.com" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "name": "the company was fined 1.2 billion won after hackers stole detailed personal profiles of more than 427,000 paid members", "url": "https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10724127", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "koreaherald.com" } } ], "hasPart": [ { "@type": "WebPageElement", "name": "When Self-Certification Meets Fact-Checking", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/matchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads#section-1-when-self-certification-meets-fact-checking" }, { "@type": "WebPageElement", "name": "Why Matchmaking Invites Exaggeration", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/matchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads#section-2-why-matchmaking-invites-exaggeration" }, { "@type": "WebPageElement", "name": "The Cost of Doing Business", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/matchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads#section-3-the-cost-of-doing-business" } ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "News", "item": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Regulatory Monitor", "item": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Duo's ₩345M Fine: A Warning Shot for Matchmaking's Opaque Promises" } ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "Why was South Korean matchmaking firm Duo fined by the Fair Trade Commission?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined Duo ₩345 million for inflating matchmaker headcount and making false claims regarding member credentials and exclusive audit status." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How many matchmakers did Duo actually employ compared to its advertising?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Duo advertised having up to 230 professional matchmakers, but South Korea's regulator established that only 188 employees arranged matches as of October 2023." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What regulatory precedent does the FTC ruling against Duo set for dating apps?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The ruling establishes that dating and matchmaking operators cannot rely on self-defined criteria and must provide objective evidence or competitor benchmarking for market superiority claims." } } ] } ] --- [![Dating Industry Insights](/assets/dii-logo-footer-B-hNTbau.webp)](/)[A High Intent Media Brand](https://www.highintentmediagroup.com) [About](/about) [Companies](/companies "Dating App Companies") [Products](/directory "Dating Products & Features") [People](/people "Industry People & Executives") [News](/news "Dating Industry News") [Reports](/reports "Market Reports & Data") [Resources](/resources "Industry Resources") Log InRegister Free Trending [Ofcom's Compliance Ultimatum: Dating Platforms Can't Wait for 2027](/news/ofcom-warns-online-safety-measures) | [Surf's Fitness Race Dates: Strategic Innovation or Marketing Stunt?](/news/surf-expands-events-partnership-hyrox-globally) | [Duo's ₩345M Fine: A Warning Shot for Matchmaking's Opaque Promises](/news/matchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads) | [EliteSingles' Resurrection: Brand Equity vs. Network Effects](/news/elitesingles-relaunches-under-new-ownership) | [Fake Dating Apps Poison User Trust: A Crisis for Startups](/news/fake-dating-app-apk-user-concerns) [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Fmatchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads&text=Duo's%20%E2%82%A9345M%20Fine%3A%20A%20Warning%20Shot%20for%20Matchmaking's%20Opaque%20Promises)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Fmatchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads)[](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Fmatchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads) 1. [Home](/) 2. [News](/news) 3. [Regulatory Monitor](/news) 4. Duo's ₩345M Fine: A Warning Shot for Matchmaking's Opaque Promises ![A South Korean corporate office desk displaying legal disclosure documents and financial regulatory compliance files.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/19535711/pexels-photo-19535711.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=1200&h=220&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) A South Korean corporate office desk displaying legal disclosure documents and financial regulatory compliance files. [Regulatory Monitor](/news?category=regulatory-monitor) # Duo's ₩345M Fine: A Warning Shot for Matchmaking's Opaque Promises By [DII Regulatory Monitor](/author/regulatory-monitor)· September 2, 2026· 6 min read [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Fmatchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads&text=Duo's%20%E2%82%A9345M%20Fine%3A%20A%20Warning%20Shot%20for%20Matchmaking's%20Opaque%20Promises)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Fmatchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads)[](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Fmatchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads) A A ## Key Points - • South Korea's Fair Trade Commission fined matchmaking firm Duo ₩345 million for making false advertising claims regarding its membership credentials and matchmaker headcount. - • Duo advertised having up to 230 professional matchmakers, but an investigation revealed only 188 employees actively arranged matches as of October 2023. - • The regulator found Duo falsely claimed to be South Korea's only externally audited matchmaking company, despite competing firm Baroyeon having public audit records on DART. - • Duo previously received a ₩1.2 billion penalty after a cyberattack exposed sensitive personal profile data belonging to more than 427,000 paid members. Duo, a premium matchmaking firm operating in South Korea, has been handed a ₩345M (£184,000) penalty by the country's Fair Trade Commission for what amounts to making it up as they went along. The infractions read like a playbook in creative categorisation: inflating professional membership counts using internally-defined criteria, claiming 'the most prestigious university graduates' without explaining what qualified as prestigious, and padding matchmaker headcount by including staff who don't actually match anyone. What makes this particularly instructive for the dating industry isn't the fine itself—£184,000 likely registers as a rounding error for a firm charging thousands per membership—but what it reveals about the information asymmetry problem baked into matchmaking services. Singles can't audit a membership database before signing up. They can't verify educational credentials or professional status. They certainly can't count how many matchmakers are actually working their account versus answering phones. Every claim about quality, exclusivity, and curation must be taken on faith, creating an obvious incentive structure for operators to embellish. ![Business professional reviewing documents at desk](https://images.pexels.com/photos/2246790/pexels-photo-2246790.jpeg) Business professional reviewing documents at desk South Korea's regulator has now drawn a line: if you're going to claim superiority, you need objective evidence or competitor benchmarking. Self-defined categories don't count. ### Create a free account Unlock unlimited access and get the weekly briefing delivered to your inbox. Register free No spam. No password. We'll send a one-time link to confirm your email. The DII Take This matters well beyond South Korea's matchmaking sector. Dating operators globally—particularly premium services and apps positioning on quality curation—routinely make claims about member bases that can't be verified pre-purchase. 'Elite', 'high-quality', 'professionally successful', 'university-educated'—the industry trades heavily in subjective categorisations that could mean anything or nothing. > The FTC's decision suggests regulators are growing tired of dating firms exploiting the fact that their product is inherently opaque until after the transaction. Expect this scrutiny to spread. ## When Self-Certification Meets Fact-Checking The specific violations paint a damning picture. According to the FTC's findings, [Duo claimed the largest number of professionals and prestigious university graduates in the industry](https://news.sbs.co.kr/english/article.do?news_id=N1008723432). Both figures were calculated using definitions Duo created internally. The company never compared its membership base to competitors. It provided no objective benchmarking methodology. The regulator classified this as advertising invented from whole cloth. Duo also advertised itself as the only matchmaking company in South Korea subject to external audit and the only one disclosed through DART, the Financial Supervisory Service's electronic disclosure system. The FTC demolished this claim in approximately the time it took to check DART's database. Baroyeon, a competing matchmaking firm, also had external audit reports available through the same system. The matchmaker headcount inflation followed a familiar pattern. Duo advertised having up to 230 professional matchmakers. The regulator counted 188 employees actually dedicated to arranging matches as of October 2023. The gap was filled with staff whose roles bore no relation to matchmaking—administrative personnel, presumably, or marketing teams now retroactively classified as part of the 'matchmaking workforce'. ![Couple meeting for first date at cafe](https://images.pexels.com/photos/17113717/pexels-photo-17113717.jpeg) Couple meeting for first date at cafe ## Why Matchmaking Invites Exaggeration Premium matchmaking services face a structural verification problem that dating apps largely avoid. An app's value proposition—at least at the mass-market level—sits in volume, features, and user experience. A matchmaking service's value sits almost entirely in claims about who else is in the database and how well the firm curates introductions. Both are invisible to prospective clients. The financial model compounds the incentive. According to industry structures typical in South Korea's marriage market, matchmaking firms charge substantial upfront fees—often thousands of pounds—based on promises about member quality, professional curation, and match potential. Clients commit before seeing a single profile. Refunds are rare. > The information asymmetry is total. South Korea's marriage crisis adds commercial pressure. The country recorded one of the world's lowest marriage rates in recent years, creating a booming industry targeting anxious singles and parents willing to pay premium rates for services promising access to 'quality' partners. Membership quality claims carry particular weight in this market. If Duo could credibly claim the most professionals or the most prestigious university graduates, that justifies pricing power and client acquisition. The FTC's intervention suggests regulators recognise how easily these dynamics slide into deception. Duo's advertising ran from April 2022 through to the investigation, indicating years of unchallenged claims before enforcement arrived. ## The Cost of Doing Business The £184,000 penalty raises the obvious question about deterrent value. The FTC hasn't disclosed Duo's revenue, market position, or client numbers, making it difficult to assess whether this fine represents material pain or simply the cost of aggressive marketing. Without revenue context, it's impossible to judge proportionality. What matters more than the quantum is the precedent. [The FTC explicitly stated that membership numbers, member qualifications, and matchmaker headcount influence consumer choice when selecting matchmaking services](https://www.koreajoongangdaily.com/korea/matchmaker-service-duo-penalized-for-claiming-the-most-doctors-and-elite-graduates/12844965). By classifying Duo's claims as false or exaggerated advertising under South Korean law, the regulator has established that subjective self-assessment doesn't constitute verifiable advertising. ![Man and woman having conversation over coffee](https://images.pexels.com/photos/2246803/pexels-photo-2246803.jpeg) Man and woman having conversation over coffee If you claim to be the biggest, the best, or the most exclusive, you need objective proof or competitive benchmarking. That standard has immediate implications for dating operators everywhere. 'Elite' dating apps routinely position on member quality without defining what elite means or how it's verified. Premium matchmaking services across markets make similar claims about professional credentials, educational pedigree, and curation standards. Very few provide objective definitions. Almost none benchmark against competitors. The Duo case demonstrates that regulators are beginning to ask uncomfortable questions about an industry built on unverifiable promises. Dating firms have long benefited from the fact that their product can't be inspected before purchase. That grace period appears to be ending. Operators making quality claims about member bases should be reviewing advertising copy and asking whether they can actually prove what they're selling—because someone may soon demand they do exactly that. This isn't Duo's first run-in with South Korean regulators. Earlier this year, [the company was fined 1.2 billion won after hackers stole detailed personal profiles of more than 427,000 paid members](https://www.koreaherald.com/article/10724127), exposing sensitive data including weight, assets, and religion—a reminder that accountability in the matchmaking sector extends well beyond advertising claims. ## Key Takeaways - • Premium dating operators using subjective descriptors such as elite or high quality must establish verifiable benchmarking standards to avoid regulatory sanctions for misleading marketing. - • As global consumer protection authorities focus on pre-purchase information asymmetry, matchmaking companies must substantiate member database claims using objective, third-party data. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### Why was South Korean matchmaking firm Duo fined by the Fair Trade Commission? ### How many matchmakers did Duo actually employ compared to its advertising? ### What regulatory precedent does the FTC ruling against Duo set for dating apps? Cite this article D [DII Regulatory Monitor](/author/regulatory-monitor) Policy & Regulation Desk The DII Regulatory Monitor tracks legislation, enforcement action, safety rules and compliance across dating industry markets. [More articles by DII Regulatory Monitor](/author/regulatory-monitor) ### In this article - [When Self-Certification Meets Fact-Checking](#section-1-when-self-certification-meets-fact-checking) - [Why Matchmaking Invites Exaggeration](#section-2-why-matchmaking-invites-exaggeration) - [The Cost of Doing Business](#section-3-the-cost-of-doing-business) ## Trending in Dating Tech 1. 1 [![A person holding a smartphone displaying a dating app profile alongside a coffee cup on a wooden table.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/7339183/pexels-photo-7339183.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/hinge-expands-face-check-direct-date) [Hinge's Face Check and Direct to Date Are Admissions That the Core Experience Is Broken](/news/hinge-expands-face-check-direct-date) 2. 2 [![A frustrated woman looks at her smartphone screen while sitting alone at a wooden cafe table.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/7339183/pexels-photo-7339183.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/study-men-go-on-more-dates) [Dating Apps' Gender Imbalance: Women Withdraw as Men Persist](/news/study-men-go-on-more-dates) 3. 3 [![A smartphone displaying a blocked dating application interface beside a digital privacy icon.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/19209287/pexels-photo-19209287.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/turkey-blocks-lgbtq-dating-apps) [Turkey's LGBTQ+ App Ban: A Test for Global Dating Platforms](/news/turkey-blocks-lgbtq-dating-apps) 4. 4 [![A smartphone displaying a modern dating app interface set against the backdrop of the Singapore city skyline.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/28539711/pexels-photo-28539711.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/chinese-dating-app-tantan-rebrands-singapore) [Tantan's 'Intentional Casual' Rebrand: A Strategic Exit from China's Grip?](/news/chinese-dating-app-tantan-rebrands-singapore) 5. 5 [![A smartphone screen displaying a Hinge dating profile with a beating heart status badge next to the user name.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/36765306/pexels-photo-36765306.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/hinge-signals-feature-highlights-user-engagement) [Hinge's 'Signals' Badge: Engagement Fix or Just a Retention Play?](/news/hinge-signals-feature-highlights-user-engagement) ### Create a free account Unlimited access — delivered weekly. Register free No spam. No password. We'll send a one-time link to confirm your email. ## Comments Join the discussion Industry professionals share insights, challenge assumptions, and connect with peers. Sign in to add your voice. Sign in with Google or use email Your comment is reviewed before publishing. No spam, no self-promotion. [← Previous Article EliteSingles' Resurrection: Brand Equity vs. Network Effects ](/news/elitesingles-relaunches-under-new-ownership)[Financial & Investor](/news?category=financial-intelligence)[Next Article → Surf's Fitness Race Dates: Strategic Innovation or Marketing Stunt? ](/news/surf-expands-events-partnership-hyrox-globally)[Technology & AI Lab](/news?category=technology-ai) ## More in Regulatory Monitor [View all →](/news?category=regulatory-monitor) [ Regulatory Monitor ![A digital smartphone screen displaying a secure age verification prompt alongside official UK regulatory compliance documents.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/9786305/pexels-photo-9786305.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Ofcom's Compliance Ultimatum: Dating Platforms Can't Wait for 2027 Ofcom has confirmed that existing Online Safety Act compliance obligations for dating platforms remain in full force, re… Wednesday 2nd September (19 hours ago) · 1 min read Read → ](/news/ofcom-warns-online-safety-measures)[ Regulatory Monitor ![A smartphone displaying a security alert screen alongside social media dating advertisements.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/37352236/pexels-photo-37352236.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Fake Dating Apps Poison User Trust: A Crisis for Startups Indian cybercrime authorities are tracking fraudsters using fake dating app ads on Facebook and Instagram to distribute … Tuesday 1st September (1 day ago) · 1 min read Read → ](/news/fake-dating-app-apk-user-concerns)[ Regulatory Monitor ![A digital screen displaying profile photos inside a security verification grid with fraud detection flags.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/20180325/pexels-photo-20180325.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Seeking's Public Scammer Gallery: Transparency or Legal Minefield? Romance scam losses reached $1.16 billion in the first nine months of 2025 in the US alone Seeking.com claims its AI ver… Monday 31st August (2 days ago) · 1 min read Read → ](/news/seeking-has-blocked-90-percent-scammers)[ Regulatory Monitor ![A smartphone user scanning their face for biometric identity verification on a mobile device screen.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/9577175/pexels-photo-9577175.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Omi's 60% Verification Rate: Safety Measure or Security Theatre? Omi reports 60% facial verification completion rate amongst users, but fails to disclose whether figure represents activ… Tuesday 25th August · 1 min read Read → ](/news/omi-facial-verification-romance-scams-asia) ![](https://images.pexels.com/photos/9786305/pexels-photo-9786305.jpeg) Up next: [Ofcom's Compliance Ultimatum: Dating Platforms Can't Wait for 2027](/news/ofcom-warns-online-safety-measures) [](/news/ofcom-warns-online-safety-measures) ![Dating Industry Insights](/assets/dii-logo-footer-B-hNTbau.webp) B2B intelligence for the online dating industry. Part of [High Intent Media Inc](https://www.highintentmediagroup.com) [in](https://www.linkedin.com/company/dating-industry-insights)[](/rss.xml) ### Explore - [News](/news) - [Companies](/companies) - [People](/people) - [Products](/directory) - [Resources](/resources) - [Data & Intelligence](/data) - [Regulation](/regulation) - [Glossary](/glossary) ### Contact - [About](/about) - [Editorial Standards](/about/editorial-standards) - [Corrections](/about/corrections) - [Ownership & Funding](/about/ownership-funding) - [Editorial Contact](/contact?subject=Editorial+Inquiry) - [Advertising & Partnerships](/contact?subject=Advertising+%26+Sponsorship) - [Press](/press) - [Submit a Listing](/contact?subject=Directory+Listing+Request) - [Sitemap](/sitemap.xml) © 2026 Dating Industry Insights. All rights reserved. 500 Paterson Plank Rd STE 31016, Union City, New Jersey, 07087, USA [Contact Us](/contact) · [Privacy Policy](/privacy) · [Terms of Use](/terms) · [Cookie Policy](/cookie-policy)