--- title: "Australia's 'Feed Choice' Law: Impact on Dating Apps" description: "Australia's proposed law could force dating apps to justify their algorithms or redesign. A pivotal moment for the industry." lang: en-GB json-ld: | [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "NewsArticle", "headline": "Australia's 'Feed Choice' Law: A Looming Challenge for Dating Apps", "description": "Australia's proposed law could force dating apps to justify their algorithms or redesign. A pivotal moment for the industry.", "abstract": "Australia's proposed law could force dating apps to justify their algorithms or redesign. A pivotal moment for the industry.", "image": [ "https://images.pexels.com/photos/36732146/pexels-photo-36732146.jpeg" ], "datePublished": "2026-09-09T10:24:18+00:00", "dateModified": "2026-09-09T10:24:18+00:00", "inLanguage": "en-GB", "isAccessibleForFree": true, "wordCount": 1168, "articleSection": "Regulatory Monitor", "author": { "@type": "Person", "name": "DII Regulatory Monitor", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/author/regulatory-monitor", "jobTitle": "Policy & Regulation Desk", "description": "The DII Regulatory Monitor tracks legislation, enforcement action, safety rules and compliance across dating industry markets.", "knowsAbout": [ "Online dating industry", "Dating app business models", "Match Group", "Dating industry regulation" ], "sameAs": [], "worksFor": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Dating Industry Insights", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/" } }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Dating Industry Insights", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/images/am-rebrand-logo.jpg" }, "parentOrganization": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "High Intent Media Inc", "url": "https://www.highintentmediagroup.com" } }, "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/australia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan" }, "isPartOf": { "@type": "WebSite", "name": "Dating Industry Insights", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/" }, "speakable": { "@type": "SpeakableSpecification", "cssSelector": [ "article h1", "article .article-body > p:first-of-type" ] }, "alternativeHeadline": "Australia has proposed mandatory feed choice legislation that would require digital platforms to offer users a choice between algorithmic recommendations and chronological feeds.", "mainEntity": { "@type": "ItemList", "name": "Key points", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Australia has proposed mandatory feed choice legislation that would require digital platforms to offer users a choice between algorithmic recommendations and chronological feeds." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "Australian regulators could impose financial penalties reaching up to A$200 million or 109.2 million US dollars on digital platforms for non-compliance with the feed choice laws." }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Match Group and Bumble operate major businesses in Australia, where Tinder consistently ranks among the country's highest-grossing mobile applications." } ] }, "backstory": "Dating app operators face strategic risk if regulators adopt functional definitions, as recommendation algorithms form the core product experience rather than optional content feeds. Compliance teams must evaluate whether to lobby for sector-specific exemptions or prepare for technical redesigns before Australian platform regulations spread globally.", "about": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Match Group", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/companies/match-group" }, "mentions": [ { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Match Group", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/companies/match-group" }, { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Bumble", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/companies/bumble" } ], "citation": [ { "@type": "WebPage", "name": "'potentially addictive features and harmful content'", "url": "https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/7/australias-proposed-opt-out-law-targets-big-tech-algorithms", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "aljazeera.com" } }, { "@type": "WebPage", "name": "requiring platforms to offer a non-algorithmic alternative entirely", "url": "https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/australia-big-tech-algorithm-big-tech-b3045727.html", "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "independent.co.uk" } } ], "hasPart": [ { "@type": "WebPageElement", "name": "The scope question no one's answered yet", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/australia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan#section-1-the-scope-question-no-one-s-answered-yet" }, { "@type": "WebPageElement", "name": "What a 'chronological dating app' would actually mean", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/australia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan#section-2-what-a-chronological-dating-app-would-actually-mean" }, { "@type": "WebPageElement", "name": "The carve-out strategy", "url": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news/australia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan#section-3-the-carve-out-strategy" } ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "name": "Home", "item": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 2, "name": "News", "item": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 3, "name": "Regulatory Monitor", "item": "https://www.datingindustryinsights.com/news" }, { "@type": "ListItem", "position": 4, "name": "Australia's 'Feed Choice' Law: A Looming Challenge for Dating Apps" } ] }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is Australia's proposed feed choice law?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Australia's proposed feed choice legislation would mandate that digital platforms present users with an upfront choice between algorithmic recommendation engines and chronological feeds. Non-compliant platforms could face penalties up to A$200 million." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How could Australia's feed choice legislation impact Tinder and Bumble?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "If Australian regulators classify dating platforms as recommendation platforms, Tinder and Bumble could be forced to alter their core matching algorithms or request regulatory exemptions." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Why does Australian digital platform regulation matter to Match Group?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Australia often serves as a global regulatory test market, and Tinder is consistently one of the highest-grossing mobile applications in the country for Match Group." } } ] } ] --- [![Dating Industry Insights](/assets/dii-logo-footer-B-hNTbau.webp)](/)[A High Intent Media Brand](https://www.highintentmediagroup.com) [About](/about) [Companies](/companies "Dating App Companies") [Products](/directory "Dating Products & Features") [People](/people "Industry People & Executives") [News](/news "Dating Industry News") [Reports](/reports "Market Reports & Data") [Resources](/resources "Industry Resources") Log InRegister Free Trending [ATEAM's Wellness Pitch: Scarcity or Strategy?](/news/ateam-launches-dating-app-wellness) | [Coffee Meets Bagel's Australian Bet: Can 'Anti-Swipe' Strategy Win?](/news/coffee-meets-bagel-australia-intentional-dating) | [Australia's 'Feed Choice' Law: A Looming Challenge for Dating Apps](/news/australia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan) | [Meetmarket's Crowdfunding Success: A Privacy Bet Grindr Can't Ignore](/news/privacy-concerns-community-gay-dating-apps) | [Midlife Women Claim Sexual Agency: A Missed Market for Dating Apps](/news/ashley-madison-women-sexuality-aging-study) [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Faustralia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan&text=Australia's%20'Feed%20Choice'%20Law%3A%20A%20Looming%20Challenge%20for%20Dating%20Apps)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Faustralia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan)[](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Faustralia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan) 1. [Home](/) 2. [News](/news) 3. [Regulatory Monitor](/news) 4. Australia's 'Feed Choice' Law: A Looming Challenge for Dating Apps ![A smartphone displaying a social media user interface alongside digital notifications on a desk.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/36732146/pexels-photo-36732146.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=1200&h=220&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) A smartphone displaying a social media user interface alongside digital notifications on a desk. [Regulatory Monitor](/news?category=regulatory-monitor) # Australia's 'Feed Choice' Law: A Looming Challenge for Dating Apps By [DII Regulatory Monitor](/author/regulatory-monitor)· September 9, 2026· 6 min read [](https://x.com/intent/post?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Faustralia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan&text=Australia's%20'Feed%20Choice'%20Law%3A%20A%20Looming%20Challenge%20for%20Dating%20Apps)[](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Faustralia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan)[](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.datingindustryinsights.com%2Fnews%2Faustralia-algorithm-opt-out-rules-plan) A A ## Key Points - • Australia has proposed mandatory feed choice legislation that would require digital platforms to offer users a choice between algorithmic recommendations and chronological feeds. - • Australian regulators could impose financial penalties reaching up to A$200 million or 109.2 million US dollars on digital platforms for non-compliance with the feed choice laws. - • Match Group and Bumble operate major businesses in Australia, where Tinder consistently ranks among the country's highest-grossing mobile applications. Australia's proposed 'feed choice' law targets social media platforms, but its implications for dating apps could prove far more significant. The legislation would require platforms to offer users an upfront decision between algorithmic recommendations and chronological feeds—a technical impossibility for dating apps where the algorithm is the entire product. What looks like social media regulation may become the framework that forces the dating industry to explain why its recommendation engines deserve different treatment, or admit they don't. The Australian government announced plans to legislate mandatory feed transparency, according to a statement from the Prime Minister's office. Platforms would need to present new and existing users with a clear choice: accept personalised algorithmic recommendations or switch to a chronological feed showing only accounts they've chosen to follow. The proposal comes with enforcement teeth—regulators could impose penalties reaching A$200 million (roughly $109.2 million) for non-compliance. That matters for dating operators because the distinction between 'social media' and 'dating platform' has never been meaningful from a technology standpoint. Both rely on recommendation engines. Both use engagement signals to surface content. Both monetise attention. The difference is that dating apps have never pretended otherwise—there's no chronological feed to toggle, no list of accounts you 'follow', just the stack the algorithm serves you. ### Create a free account Unlock unlimited access and get the weekly briefing delivered to your inbox. Register free No spam. No password. We'll send a one-time link to confirm your email. ![Person using smartphone with social media application interface](https://images.pexels.com/photos/36732162/pexels-photo-36732162.jpeg) Person using smartphone with social media application interface The DII Take > This looks like social media regulation, but it's actually a stress test for any platform built on recommendations rather than user-curated networks. Dating apps can't offer a chronological feed of profiles they follow because members don't follow anyone—the algorithm is the product. If Australia decides that principle applies beyond social media, operators will face a choice between fundamentally redesigning their products or lobbying hard to carve out an exemption. Neither option is cheap. ## The scope question no one's answered yet The legislation, as described, targets social media platforms. Whether dating apps fall under that definition depends on drafting the government hasn't yet published. Tinder, Hinge, and [Bumble](/companies/bumble) don't fit neatly into 'social media' as traditionally understood—you're not posting updates or building follower networks. But from a technical and experiential standpoint, they're recommendation platforms that surface user-generated profiles based on algorithmic signals. If Australian regulators take a functional view—looking at what platforms do rather than how they're labelled—dating apps could easily find themselves in scope. And if they don't, the precedent still matters. Once one category of consumer platform is required to offer algorithm-free alternatives, the rationale extends logically to any service where recommendations drive the core experience. Match Group and Bumble operate substantial businesses in Australia. [Tinder](/products/tinder) has consistently ranked among the country's highest-grossing apps, and Australia served as a test market for several Match initiatives over the past three years. The region also pioneered the news media bargaining code that forced Meta and Google to pay publishers, and launched [age verification](/glossary/age-verification) trials for adult content that the UK government cited as precedent. When Australia regulates digital platforms, other markets watch. ![Mobile phone displaying dating application profile interface](https://images.pexels.com/photos/36732154/pexels-photo-36732154.jpeg) Mobile phone displaying dating application profile interface ## What a 'chronological dating app' would actually mean The practical challenge here isn't technical—it's existential. A dating app without algorithmic recommendations is essentially a directory with filters. You'd see profiles in the order they joined, or based on proximity, or sorted by some basic attribute. No compatibility scoring, no learning from swipe behaviour, no optimisation for engagement or match quality. Some operators might argue that's actually better—more transparent, less manipulative, potentially more equitable for members who don't fit the engagement patterns algorithms reward. But it would certainly be less profitable. Algorithmic feeds keep users swiping longer, seeing more profiles, hitting rate limits that drive subscriptions. A chronological feed of every active member within 25 miles would be overwhelming, unfiltered, and difficult to monetise at current [ARPU](/glossary/arpu) levels. The alternative—a feed showing only profiles you've explicitly chosen to 'follow' or save—doesn't solve the problem either. Dating apps aren't built around persistent connections before matching. You can't follow someone; you can only express interest and wait to see if it's mutual. The entire interaction model assumes the platform surfaces candidates rather than users curating their own discovery. ## The carve-out strategy Dating platforms would likely argue they deserve different treatment because recommendations aren't addictive engagement tactics—they're the core service members are paying for. You download Tinder because you want the algorithm to show you potential matches, not because you want to scroll every profile in your postcode. > When [Hinge](/products/hinge) calls itself 'designed to be deleted' while optimising for daily active users, or when Tinder's Explore tab recommends profiles based on engagement rather than compatibility signals, the line between 'helpful matching' and 'addictive feed' gets blurry. That's not an unreasonable position. But it requires trust that the algorithm optimises for member outcomes rather than engagement metrics, and the industry hasn't built much of that trust. The government's framing—focused on giving users control over ['potentially addictive features and harmful content'](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/7/australias-proposed-opt-out-law-targets-big-tech-algorithms)—doesn't obviously exclude dating apps. Regulators in multiple markets have questioned whether dating platforms adequately disclose how recommendations work, what signals they prioritise, and whose interests they serve. An opt-in requirement would force that conversation into the product itself. ![Hand holding smartphone showing social media feed and notifications](https://images.pexels.com/photos/37765137/pexels-photo-37765137.jpeg) Hand holding smartphone showing social media feed and notifications The timeline remains unclear—Australia hasn't published draft legislation or indicated when it would take effect. But the direction is consistent with regulatory momentum across multiple jurisdictions. The EU's Digital Services Act already requires large platforms to disclose how recommendation systems work and allow users to modify or disable personalisation. The UK's Online Safety Act gives Ofcom powers to assess algorithmic amplification of harm. Australia's proposal takes the next logical step: [requiring platforms to offer a non-algorithmic alternative entirely](https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/australia-big-tech-algorithm-big-tech-b3045727.html). For dating operators, the strategic question is whether to engage early—arguing for sector-specific rules that acknowledge how matching differs from social feeds—or wait to see if the definition of 'social media' captures them at all. The former is more expensive but offers more control. The latter is a gamble that regulators will draw distinctions the technology itself increasingly makes meaningless. ## Key Takeaways - • Dating app operators face strategic risk if regulators adopt functional definitions, as recommendation algorithms form the core product experience rather than optional content feeds. - • Compliance teams must evaluate whether to lobby for sector-specific exemptions or prepare for technical redesigns before Australian platform regulations spread globally. ## Frequently Asked Questions ### What is Australia's proposed feed choice law? ### How could Australia's feed choice legislation impact Tinder and Bumble? ### Why does Australian digital platform regulation matter to Match Group? Cite this article D [DII Regulatory Monitor](/author/regulatory-monitor) Policy & Regulation Desk The DII Regulatory Monitor tracks legislation, enforcement action, safety rules and compliance across dating industry markets. [More articles by DII Regulatory Monitor](/author/regulatory-monitor) ### In this article - [The scope question no one's answered yet](#section-1-the-scope-question-no-one-s-answered-yet) - [What a 'chronological dating app' would actually mean](#section-2-what-a-chronological-dating-app-would-actually-mean) - [The carve-out strategy](#section-3-the-carve-out-strategy) ### Mentioned in This Article Companies [![Bumble logo](https://img.logo.dev/bumble.com?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram) Bumble Dating Platform BMBL $4.87 ▲+3.40% ](/companies/bumble)[![Match Group logo](https://img.logo.dev/mtch.com?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram) Match Group Dating Platform MTCH $31.42 ▼-1.20% ](/companies/match-group) Products [![SURF logo](https://img.logo.dev/name/SURF?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)SURF ](/products/surf)[![Bumble logo](https://img.logo.dev/name/Bumble?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)Bumble ](/products/bumble)[![Tinder logo](https://img.logo.dev/tinder.com?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)Tinder ](/products/tinder)[![Once logo](https://img.logo.dev/name/Once?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)Once ](/products/once)[![Hinge logo](https://img.logo.dev/hinge.co?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)Hinge ](/products/hinge)[![HER logo](https://img.logo.dev/weareher.com?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)HER ](/products/her-app)[![Plans logo](https://img.logo.dev/name/Plans?token=pk_K6hdbPRcTQSnsRNEiZ-Ymg&size=64&format=png&fallback=monogram)Plans ](/products/plans) ## Trending in Dating Tech 1. 1 [![A man and woman with a noticeable age gap talking during a date.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/20026102/pexels-photo-20026102.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/women-men-open-to-older-dating) [Tawkify's Age Gap Data: A Quantified Double Standard in Dating](/news/women-men-open-to-older-dating) 2. 2 [![A young adult looking thoughtfully at a smartphone dating app profile while sitting at a brightly lit outdoor cafe.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/16959686/pexels-photo-16959686.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/tinder-thailand-campaign-challenges-performative-dating) [Tinder's Thailand Campaign Admits Swipe Model's Flaws. Retention Crisis Looms?](/news/tinder-thailand-campaign-challenges-performative-dating) 3. 3 [![A mobile phone displaying a dating app verification screen beside Japanese legal documents.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/7339183/pexels-photo-7339183.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/misleading-profiles-japan-dating-apps) [Japan Made Dating App Fraud Illegal. The Rest of the World Is Watching.](/news/misleading-profiles-japan-dating-apps) 4. 4 [![Sprite soft drink cans featuring the Tinder logo displayed on a retail shop shelf.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/29336185/pexels-photo-29336185.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/tinder-launches-sprite-packaging-promotion) [Tinder's Sprite Partnership Signals That Brand Revenue Is Plugging a Growth Gap](/news/tinder-launches-sprite-packaging-promotion) 5. 5 [![A concerned smartphone user reviewing a dating app notification on screen.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/16994607/pexels-photo-16994607.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=96&h=96&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1)](/news/elitesingles-suddenly-shutting-down-april) [EliteSingles' Sudden Shutdown: A Grim Signal for Spark Networks](/news/elitesingles-suddenly-shutting-down-april) ### Create a free account Unlimited access — delivered weekly. Register free No spam. No password. We'll send a one-time link to confirm your email. ## Comments Join the discussion Industry professionals share insights, challenge assumptions, and connect with peers. Sign in to add your voice. Sign in with Google or use email Your comment is reviewed before publishing. No spam, no self-promotion. [← Previous Article Meetmarket's Crowdfunding Success: A Privacy Bet Grindr Can't Ignore ](/news/privacy-concerns-community-gay-dating-apps)[Financial & Investor](/news?category=financial-intelligence)[Next Article → Coffee Meets Bagel's Australian Bet: Can 'Anti-Swipe' Strategy Win? ](/news/coffee-meets-bagel-australia-intentional-dating)[Daily News Wire](/news?category=daily-news) ## More in Regulatory Monitor [View all →](/news?category=regulatory-monitor) [ Regulatory Monitor ![A glowing digital padlock overlaying a smartphone showing an online dating profile interface.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/29858531/pexels-photo-29858531.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Match and Bumble's AI Dreams Clash with Europe's Data Reality Europe's online dating market will grow from $1.15bn in 2025 to $1.63bn by 2031, representing a 5.99% compound annual gr… Friday 4th September (5 days ago) · 1 min read Read → ](/news/europes-online-dating-market-forecast-2031)[ Regulatory Monitor ![A smartphone displaying a dating profile alongside legal paperwork representing compliance regulations for online dating platforms.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/20519877/pexels-photo-20519877.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Match Group's $650K Settlement: A Reality Check on Safety Theatre Match Group settled with New Jersey for $650,000 over allegations it misrepresented criminal background screening practi… Thursday 3rd September (6 days ago) · 1 min read Read → ](/news/match-group-new-jersey-safety-disclosures)[ Regulatory Monitor ![A digital smartphone screen displaying a secure age verification prompt alongside official UK regulatory compliance documents.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/9786305/pexels-photo-9786305.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Ofcom's Compliance Ultimatum: Dating Platforms Can't Wait for 2027 Ofcom has confirmed that existing Online Safety Act compliance obligations for dating platforms remain in full force, re… Wednesday 2nd September · 1 min read Read → ](/news/ofcom-warns-online-safety-measures)[ Regulatory Monitor ![A South Korean corporate office desk displaying legal disclosure documents and financial regulatory compliance files.](https://images.pexels.com/photos/19535711/pexels-photo-19535711.jpeg?auto=compress&cs=tinysrgb&w=600&h=340&fit=crop&fm=webp&q=50&dpr=1) ### Duo's ₩345M Fine: A Warning Shot for Matchmaking's Opaque Promises South Korean matchmaking firm Duo fined ₩345M (£184,000) by the Fair Trade Commission for false advertising claims about… Wednesday 2nd September · 1 min read Read → ](/news/matchmaker-duo-fined-over-misleading-ads) ![](https://images.pexels.com/photos/29858531/pexels-photo-29858531.jpeg) Up next: [Match and Bumble's AI Dreams Clash with Europe's Data Reality](/news/europes-online-dating-market-forecast-2031) [](/news/europes-online-dating-market-forecast-2031) ![Dating Industry Insights](/assets/dii-logo-footer-B-hNTbau.webp) B2B intelligence for the online dating industry. Part of [High Intent Media Inc](https://www.highintentmediagroup.com) [in](https://www.linkedin.com/company/dating-industry-insights)[](/rss.xml) ### Explore - [News](/news) - [Companies](/companies) - [People](/people) - [Products](/directory) - [Resources](/resources) - [Data & Intelligence](/data) - [Regulation](/regulation) - [Glossary](/glossary) ### Contact - [About](/about) - [Editorial Standards](/about/editorial-standards) - [Corrections](/about/corrections) - [Ownership & Funding](/about/ownership-funding) - [Editorial Contact](/contact?subject=Editorial+Inquiry) - [Advertising & Partnerships](/contact?subject=Advertising+%26+Sponsorship) - [Press](/press) - [Submit a Listing](/contact?subject=Directory+Listing+Request) - [Sitemap](/sitemap.xml) © 2026 Dating Industry Insights. All rights reserved. 500 Paterson Plank Rd STE 31016, Union City, New Jersey, 07087, USA [Contact Us](/contact) · [Privacy Policy](/privacy) · [Terms of Use](/terms) · [Cookie Policy](/cookie-policy)